A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out among possible neighbours above the development of a wall at a coastal web-site in a north Dublin suburb, a situation which has captivated countrywide focus pursuing an Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on the proposed spouse and children house at Sutton Strand, the place allegations of planning breaches, environmental issues, and prolonged-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in the courts. The Irish Situations article about René Collier as well as the Irish Moments short article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what started as a neighborhood disagreement has advanced into a very publicised authorized battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than building functions at the positioning on Dublin Road, Sutton, exactly where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and a company director respectively, request to make their spouse and children household. The case is now emblematic of broader disputes alongside Ireland’s coastline, where development pressures collide with environmental protections as well as sensitivities of recognized citizens. According to the Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall staying made by their prospective neighbours goes outside of the boundaries permitted beneath preparing authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, the two people of Dublin Street, assert that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms in their preparing authorization by building a wall outside of the boundaries of their web-site, leading to an encroachment over a Special Place of Conservation. The SAC designation is central towards the dispute, as a result areas are subject matter to strict controls underneath European and Irish environmental legislation. Within their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minimal encroachments could have Long lasting ecological outcomes, specifically inside of a sensitive coastal surroundings which include Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They're in breach of their setting up authorization, and say the wall, that is partially created, is in the proper posture. Their legal group has characterised the action as an try to delay or frustrate a lawful growth. The few accuse litigants of trying to find to halt homebuilding to be able to preserve their look at, an allegation which has been recurring in court docket and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the guts of numerous coastal setting up disputes, where by sights of The ocean are both equally remarkably prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained spectacular attempts with the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded via ocean in storm to photograph the website, according to sworn proof referenced in the Irish Times. In a single account, Rene Collier waded by way of waistline-higher h2o through a storm to photograph the location Irish Moments, an image which includes considering that grow to be emblematic from the depth in the dispute. These steps were not basically symbolic; they have been intended to Acquire visual evidence of the wall’s situation relative to tidal lines and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site within the sea Irish Instances reported, describing how the two Adult males entered the water all through extreme climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by means of storm h2o to photograph the site grew to become Probably the most placing descriptions to arise from court reporting. The Irish Instances article about accountant Paul Feely mentioned that these types of steps have been cited to exhibit the plaintiffs’ perception the wall prolonged into a region affected by tidal movement, strengthening their argument that the SAC was staying encroached on.
The events at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 had been lined intimately because of the countrywide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Times 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Occasions January 27 2026 became extensively searched phrases as visitors sought to be aware of the qualifications and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court listened to even more submissions on whether interim orders ought to be granted to halt construction pending a full Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a important second during the authorized timeline.
On the core of the dispute is really a disagreement over boundaries, planning compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely maintain which the wall, as produced, goes outside of what was accredited and intrudes into guarded land. They argue that this is not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by profession, has been described as meticulous in his assessment of setting up paperwork, maps, and conditions hooked up on the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both of those stressed that their motion is inspired by concern for environmental defense and adherence to preparing regulation. They reject claims that the situation is about preserving a private perspective, insisting alternatively that it's about making certain that development at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological restrictions. In affidavits, Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 they've got explained their extended-standing relationship to the area and their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On the other aspect, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed them selves as a couple basically attempting to make a family property in accordance with the law. They deny the wall encroaches over a Special Location of Conservation and say that each one is effective have already been completed dependant on professional suggestions and permitted designs. Their lawyers have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the dramatic steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, such as getting into the sea in the course of a storm, do not change the fundamental facts.
The case has also elevated broader questions on how preparing disputes are solved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute over building of wall at coastal web-site has become a shorthand description for any condition that many observers see as progressively popular. As sea levels rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation among personal land, community foreshore, and guarded habitats has become more contentious.
The Irish Occasions write-up about René Collier observed the businessman had Formerly been associated with neighborhood advocacy on arranging and environmental difficulties, nevertheless not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Periods posting about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people today from pretty distinctive professional backgrounds can discover by themselves aligned in these kinds of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reviews spell their names, are getting to be synonymous Together with the Sutton Strand case.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning from the sea Irish Periods coverage emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded as a result of waist-significant h2o in the course of a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Instances and René Collier waded by midsection-higher drinking water through a storm to photograph the site Irish Instances are phrases that appeared regularly in protection, reflecting both the physical actuality on the coastline as well as symbolic mother nature of the act. For supporters from the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated dedication; for critics, they illustrated what they see as an excessive strategy.
Since the High Court proceedings keep on, the end result stays uncertain. The court should decide whether the wall as developed complies with organizing permission and regardless of whether any encroachment into a Special Area of Conservation has happened. The authorized arguments are intricate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal knowledge, and organizing situations. However the human element continues to be central: neighbours who ought to Dwell alongside one another prolonged after the lawful charges have already been compensated.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above construction is effective at the location on Dublin Road, Sutton, though the implications of the case increase outside of that address. For planners, builders, and residents alike, the dispute serves for a reminder of the significance of clarity in scheduling permissions and sensitivity in coastal growth. Additionally, it underscores how immediately a local disagreement can escalate when essential problems for instance environmental protection and residence legal rights are perceived for being at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand continues to be a place of pure beauty and contested boundaries. The wall with the centre of your dispute stands partially developed, a Actual physical manifestation of unresolved lawful concerns. No matter if it will in the end be altered, taken off, or done as prepared will depend on the court’s findings. Until finally then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will probable go on to look in headlines, joined indelibly to Probably the most closely watched preparing disputes in north Dublin in recent years.